雅思作文结论段如何写才能得高分？-梅苑双语网

雅思作文结论段的写作策略与技巧

雅思作文的结论段是整篇文章的收尾部分，虽然篇幅较短，但其重要性不容忽视，一个优秀的结论段能够有效总结全文观点，强化论证逻辑，给考官留下深刻印象，本文将从结论段的功能、结构要素、常见误区及实用技巧等方面展开详细阐述，帮助考生掌握结论段的写作方法。

雅思作文结论段

结论段的核心功能

结论段的首要功能是总结全文，即对引言段提出的论点和主体段展开的论证进行概括性回顾，结论段需要重申核心观点，但需避免简单重复引言中的语句，而是通过同义替换或句式变换进行二次强调，结论段还可以适当升华主题，提出展望或建议，为文章增添深度，值得注意的是，结论段不应引入新的论点或数据，否则会破坏文章结构的完整性。

结论段的结构要素

一个结构清晰的结论段通常包含以下三个部分：

开头句（重申观点）
以简洁的语言再次明确文章的中心论点，“In conclusion, while technology offers unprecedented convenience, its overuse may lead to social isolation.”
主体句（总结论证）
概括主体段的核心论据，可采用“To begin with... Furthermore... Finally...”等逻辑连接词，“To begin with, excessive screen time reduces face-to-face interactions. Furthermore, it may exacerbate mental health issues among adolescents.”
结尾句（升华主题）
提出建议、展望未来或强调意义，“Therefore, it is imperative for individuals and societies to strike a balance between technological advancement and human connection.”

以下表格展示了结论段的结构模板：

组成部分	功能	示例句式
开头句	重申核心观点	“To sum up, ...”
主体句	总结主体段论据	“The arguments above demonstrate that...”
结尾句	升华主题或提出建议	“It is recommended that...”

结论段的常见误区

许多考生在写结论段时容易陷入以下误区：

简单复制引言段
直接照搬引言中的句子会导致内容重复，缺乏新意，建议通过调整语序或替换关键词进行改写。
引入新论点
结论段的目的是收束全文，而非展开新论证，若需补充内容，应将其置于主体段。
过于冗长或简短
结论段一般占全文篇幅的10%-15%，约40-60词，过短显得草率，过长则可能冲淡主题。
使用模糊表达
如“Maybe...”或“I think...”等不确定的表述会削弱论证力度，应改为肯定语气。

实用写作技巧

同义替换与句式变换
引言中写“Technology has revolutionized communication.”，结论段可改为“The advent of technology has fundamentally transformed interpersonal communication.”
使用逻辑连接词
如“Overall,” “Ultimately,” 或 “All in all,” 等短语能够增强段落的连贯性。
避免绝对化表述
除非有充分依据，否则慎用“always”或“never”等词汇，以体现论证的客观性。
结合具体题型调整内容
- 同意与否题型：需明确立场，“Despite some drawbacks, the benefits of remote work outweigh its limitations.”
- 讨论双方题型：需平衡观点，“While both traditional and online education have merits, a blended approach may yield optimal results.”

优秀结论段范例

Some people believe that university education should be free for everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

结论段：
“Overall, while the financial burden of tuition fees may deter some individuals from pursuing higher education, completely free university education is neither sustainable nor equitable. Firstly, it would place an excessive strain on public resources, potentially diverting funds from essential services like healthcare. Secondly, without a contribution from students, the perceived value of degrees might diminish. Instead, governments should consider income-contingent loan schemes to ensure accessibility while maintaining accountability. Ultimately, a balanced approach that promotes both inclusivity and responsibility is the most viable solution.”