托福独立写作题目

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more important for a government to spend money on improving public facilities (such as parks, libraries, and public swimming pools) than on building large shopping centers or sports stadiums.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

范文

(立场：同意)

In the contemporary era, the allocation of public funds has become a critical topic for governments worldwide. When deciding how to best serve their citizens, a pivotal choice arises: should investments be directed towards enhancing public facilities like parks and libraries, or towards constructing grand commercial complexes and sports arenas? While the latter may promise short-term economic stimulation, I firmly believe that prioritizing the improvement of public facilities is a far more crucial and beneficial strategy for any government.

First and foremost, investing in public facilities fosters a more equitable and healthy society. Unlike large shopping centers and sports stadiums, which often cater to specific demographics or require paid admission, public facilities such as parks, community centers, and public libraries are accessible to everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic status. A well-maintained park provides a free and safe space for children to play, for families to picnic, and for the elderly to exercise, thereby promoting physical and mental well-being. Similarly, a library is a cornerstone of education and self-improvement, offering free access to books, the internet, and learning resources to underprivileged individuals who might not otherwise afford them. These spaces act as great equalizers, ensuring that all citizens have the opportunity to lead healthier, more enriched lives. In contrast, a new sports stadium might generate excitement on game days, but its benefits are often limited to a small number of sports fans and do little to address the daily needs of the general population.

Furthermore, public facilities serve as the very fabric that strengthens community bonds and social cohesion. Parks and libraries are not just places for individual activities; they are social hubs where people from diverse backgrounds can interact and connect. A local community library might host reading clubs for children, job workshops for adults, and cultural events for seniors, creating a vibrant and interconnected community. These shared experiences build a sense of belonging and collective identity, which is essential for a stable and harmonious society. On the other hand, large shopping centers, while convenient, tend to encourage individualistic consumer behavior. People go there to shop, often alone or in small groups, and interactions are typically transactional rather than communal. A sports stadium, with its roaring crowds, can create a sense of temporary unity, but it is often based on supporting a team rather than fostering genuine, day-to-day relationships among neighbors.

Finally, from a long-term perspective, investing in public facilities yields more sustainable and profound returns. Parks contribute to environmental health by reducing urban heat islands, improving air quality, and preserving green spaces. Libraries cultivate an educated populace, which is the foundation of innovation, economic growth, and civic engagement. These are the types of investments that build a city's intellectual and social capital, paying dividends for generations to come. While a new shopping center might boost retail sales and a stadium might attract tourists for major events, these are often short-term gains. They can also lead to issues like traffic congestion and increased cost of living, which may degrade the overall quality of life. True progress is measured not by the height of its skyscrapers or the size of its malls, but by the well-being and opportunities available to its average citizen.

In conclusion, while the allure of modern commercial and entertainment venues is understandable, they should not overshadow the fundamental importance of public facilities. By prioritizing investments in parks, libraries, and community centers, governments can promote health, strengthen social ties, and build a more equitable and sustainable future. Therefore, I am convinced that improving public facilities is a more vital and worthwhile use of public funds.

范文解析

文章结构

1. 引言段:

   • 背景引入: 从政府资金分配的宏观话题切入。
   • 题目重述: 用自己的话复述题目中的两种选择。
   • 明确立场: 清晰地表明自己“同意”的观点，并简要概括理由（促进公平健康、加强社区联系、带来长期可持续回报）。

2. 主体段一:

   • 主题句: Investing in public facilities fosters a more equitable and healthy society. (投资公共设施促进更公平、更健康的社会。)
   • 论证思路: 对比论证，强调公共设施的普惠性，与大型购物中心和体育场的排他性/特定性形成对比。
   • 例子:
     • 公园: 为所有人提供免费的运动和休闲空间。
     • 图书馆: 为弱势群体提供免费的教育资源。
   • 小结: 公共设施是社会“平衡器”，而体育场的好处仅限于少数人。

3. 主体段二:

   • 主题句: Public facilities serve as the very fabric that strengthens community bonds and social cohesion. (公共设施是加强社区纽带和社会凝聚力的基石。)
   • 论证思路: 再次使用对比论证，强调公共设施的社交功能，与购物中心的个人主义消费行为和体育场的短暂性狂热形成对比。
   • 例子:
     • 图书馆/社区中心: 举办各种活动，促进不同背景的人们交流，建立真正的邻里关系。
     • 购物中心: 主要是交易行为，缺乏深度社交。
     • 体育场: 狂热是短暂的，基于团队而非社区。
   • 小结: 公共设施建立持久的社区归属感。

4. 主体段三:

   • 主题句: From a long-term perspective, investing in public facilities yields more sustainable and profound returns. (从长远来看，投资公共设施能带来更可持续和深远的回报。)
   • 论证思路: 从长期可持续性角度出发，对比短期经济利益。
   • 例子:
     • 公园: 环境效益（降温、净化空气）。
     • 图书馆: 培养教育水平，促进创新和公民参与。
   • 对比: 购物中心和体育场带来的是短期经济刺激，但可能伴随交通、生活成本上升等问题。
   • 小结: 真正的进步衡量标准是公民的福祉和机会。

5. 结论段:

   • 重申立场: 再次强调，尽管商业和娱乐场所有其吸引力，但公共设施更为根本。
   • 总结理由: 概括三个主体段的核心论点（促进健康、加强社区、建设可持续未来）。
   • 升华主题: 用一句有力的话收尾，重申观点。

语言亮点与词汇

• 高级词汇:

  • Allocation (n.) - 分配
  • Pivotal (adj.) - 关键的，核心的
  • Stimulation (n.) - 刺激，促进
  • Equitable (adj.) - 公平的，公正的
  • Socioeconomic status - 社会经济地位
  • Cornerstone (n.) - 基石，柱石
  • Underprivileged (adj.) - 贫困的，社会地位低下的
  • Cohesion (n.) - 凝聚力
  • Interconnected (adj.) - 相互连接的
  • Collective identity - 集体认同感
  • Harmonious (adj.) - 和谐的
  • Sustainable (adj.) - 可持续的
  • Profound (adj.) - 深刻的，深远的
  • Dividends (n.) - 回报，收益
  • Allure (n.) - 诱惑，吸引力
  • Overshadow (v.) - 使...相形见绌，掩盖

• 句式结构:

  • 状语从句: When deciding how to best serve their citizens..., While the latter may promise short-term economic stimulation...
  • 非限制性定语从句: ...which often cater to specific demographics or require paid admission...
  • 倒装句: Gone are the days when... (范文中未使用，但这是很好的高级句式)
  • 平行结构: ...for children to play, for families to picnic, and for the elderly to exercise..., ...promoting physical and mental well-being.
  • 插入语: I firmly believe that..., thereby promoting...

相关话题与词汇拓展

为了帮助你准备更多相关题目,这里提供一些相关话题和核心词汇。

相关话题:

1. 城市规划:

   • 题目: Should governments spend more money on improving public transportation or on building new roads?
   • 思路: 公共交通 vs. 私家车，环保，效率，缓解拥堵。

2. 环境保护:

   • 题目: Is it more