雅思作文题目

Nowadays, it is common for parents to send their children to various extra-curricular classes or hire private tutors after school.

Why do parents do this? Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

题目分析

这是一个典型的“原因 + 利弊分析”类雅思大作文题目。

1. 背景陈述: 题目指出，现在父母普遍会让孩子参加校外课程或请家教。
2. 第一个问题: 要求分析父母这么做的原因。
3. 第二个问题: 要求你判断这种趋势的利弊，并给出自己的观点（利大于弊还是弊大于利）。

在写作时,你需要清晰地回答这两个问题，并保持逻辑连贯、论证充分。

高分范文

In contemporary society, it has become a prevalent phenomenon for parents to enrol their children in a myriad of extra-curricular activities and engage private tutors beyond regular school hours. This essay will delve into the primary motivations behind this trend and argue that while the benefits are significant, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked.

The rationale for parents investing heavily in their children's supplementary education is multifaceted. Firstly, there is a pervasive anxiety surrounding academic competition. In an increasingly globalised world, parents perceive a fierce race for limited spots in top-tier universities and subsequent career opportunities. Consequently, they believe that extra tuition can provide a crucial competitive edge, ensuring their children outperform their peers. Secondly, many parents feel that the standard school curriculum is insufficient to meet the diverse needs of their children. They may seek specialised instruction in areas such as music, sports, or art, aiming to foster a well-rounded individual with a broad skill set, rather than focusing solely on academic achievement. Finally, for some dual-income families, after-school classes serve as a practical solution, offering a safe and supervised environment for children while parents are at work.

On the one hand, the advantages of this approach are undeniable. The most significant benefit is the potential for enhanced academic performance. Personalised tutoring can address specific learning gaps and cater to an individual's learning pace, which is often not feasible in a standard classroom with a high student-to-teacher ratio. This targeted support can lead to higher grades and a stronger academic foundation. Furthermore, extra-curricular activities are instrumental in developing a child's non-academic skills. Participation in team sports, for instance, cultivates invaluable qualities such as teamwork, discipline, and resilience, which are essential for personal growth and future success in any field.

On the other hand, this trend carries several notable disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the immense pressure placed upon children. An over-packed schedule of school, homework, and additional classes can lead to chronic stress, anxiety, and burnout. This relentless pursuit of excellence can strip away the joy of learning and childhood play, potentially harming a child's mental well-being and creativity. Moreover, the financial burden on families is substantial. The cost of private tutors and premium classes can be exorbitant, exacerbating social inequality and creating a two-tiered education system where only the affluent can afford such advantages.

In conclusion, while the pursuit of supplementary education is driven by understandable desires for academic success and holistic development, its negative impact on children's mental health and the potential for social inequality cannot be ignored. Therefore, I am inclined to believe that the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages. A more balanced approach, which prioritises a child's well-being and allows for ample unstructured play and rest, is ultimately more conducive to fostering truly happy, healthy, and motivated individuals.

高分词汇与短语解析

• Prevalent phenomenon: 普遍现象
• Enrol their children in: 让孩子报名参加
• A myriad of: 大量的，各种各样的
• Engage private tutors: 聘请家教
• Delve into: 深入探究
• Rationale: 根本原因，理由
• Investing heavily in: 在……上投入巨大
• Supplementary education: 补充教育，校外教育
• Multifaceted: 多方面的
• Pervasive anxiety: 普遍存在的焦虑
• Top-tier universities: 顶尖大学
• Competitive edge: 竞争优势
• Outperform their peers: 在同龄人中表现更出色
• Standard school curriculum: 标准学校课程
• Foster a well-rounded individual: 培养全面发展的人
• Dual-income families: 双职工家庭
• Supervised environment: 有监督的环境
• Undeniable: 不可否认的
• Personalised tutoring: 个性化辅导
• Address specific learning gaps: 解决特定的学习短板
• Student-to-teacher ratio: 师生比
• Instrumental in: 在……方面起重要作用
• Cultivate invaluable qualities: 培养宝贵的品质
• Resilience: 韧性，复原力
• Notable disadvantages: 值得注意的缺点
• Pressing concern: 迫切需要关注的问题
• Over-packed schedule: 过于紧凑的日程安排
• Chronic stress, anxiety, and burnout: 慢性压力、焦虑和职业倦怠（此处用于儿童）
• Relentless pursuit of excellence: 对卓越的无止境追求
• Strip away the joy of learning and childhood play: 剥夺学习和童年的乐趣
• Mental well-being: 精神健康
• Exorbitant: 昂贵的，过高的
• Exacerbating social inequality: 加剧社会不平等
• Two-tiered education system: 双层教育体系
• Affluent: 富裕的
• Inclined to believe: 倾向于认为
• Balanced approach: 平衡的方法
• Prioritise a child's well-being: 优先考虑孩子的福祉
• Ample unstructured play and rest: 充足的非结构化玩耍和休息
• Conducive to: 有助于，有利于

写作思路解析

1. 引言段:

   • 背景引入: 用 "prevalent phenomenon" 和 "myriad of extra-curricular activities" 来描述题目中的社会现象。
   • 双问题回应: 明确指出本文将探讨两个问题：父母的原因和利弊分析。
   • 亮明观点: 用 "argue that while the benefits are significant, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked" 来暗示这是一个复杂的问题，利弊并存，但最终会偏向一方，为下文的结论做铺垫。

2. 主体段一 (原因分析):

   • 主题句: "The rationale... is multifaceted." 提出原因是多方面的。
   • 分论点1 (竞争压力): 使用 "academic competition" 和 "fierce race" 来解释父母对未来的焦虑，以及他们如何通过课外辅导来获得 "competitive edge"。
   • 分论点2 (全面发展): 指出学校课程的不足，父母希望孩子在艺术、体育等方面得到发展，成为 "well-rounded individual"。
   • 分论点3 (实际需求): 从双职工家庭的角度出发，说明课后班解决了无人看管孩子的实际问题。

3. 主体段二 (优势分析):

   • 主题句: "On the one hand, the advantages... are undeniable."
   • 分论点1 (学业提升): 强调个性化辅导的优势，如 "address specific learning gaps" 和 "cater to an individual's learning pace"，这在标准课堂中难以实现。
   • 分论点2 (素质培养): 以团队运动为例，说明课外活动能培养 "teamwork, discipline, and resilience" 等软技能。

4. 主体段三 (劣势分析):

   • 主题句: "On the other hand, this trend carries several notable disadvantages."
   • 分论点1 (儿童压力): 这是最核心的缺点，指出紧凑的日程会导致 "stress, anxiety, and burnout"，并强调这会 "strip away the joy of learning"。
   • 分论点2 (经济与社会不平等): 分析其高昂的成本 "exorbitant cost"，并指出这会 "exacerbating social inequality"，造成教育机会的不均等。

5. 结论段:

   • 重申观点: 总结父母的动机是 "understandable"，但负面影响同样 "cannot be ignored"。
   • 明确立场: 清晰地给出最终判断："the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages."
   • 提出建议/展望: 呼吁一种更 "balanced approach"，强调孩子的 "well-being" 和 "unstructured play" 的重要性，使结尾更有深度和建设性。