雅思大作文题目

类型： 议论文 Some people believe that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

中文翻译： 一些人认为，提高道路安全的最佳方法是提高驾驶汽车或摩托车的法定最低年龄,你在多大程度上同意或不同意这个观点？

高分范文

(Band 8.0-9.0)

The issue of road safety is a perennial concern for governments and citizens worldwide, with a tragic human and economic cost. In response, some advocate for a legislative solution by raising the minimum legal driving age. While I acknowledge that this measure could have a positive impact, I firmly believe that it is not the most effective strategy on its own, and a multi-faceted approach is required to significantly reduce accidents.

On the one hand, the argument for increasing the driving age has merit. Young drivers, particularly teenagers, are statistically overrepresented in road accident statistics. This is often attributed to a combination of factors, including their lack of driving experience, a propensity for risk-taking behaviour, and an underdeveloped sense of danger. By restricting access to a driver's license until an older age, say 18 or 21, it is plausible that we could see an immediate decrease in accidents involving this vulnerable demographic. For instance, in countries where the driving age is 18, the rate of crashes for 16- and 17-year-olds is demonstrably lower than in regions where it is 16. This suggests that a higher age limit directly correlates with increased safety for young people.

On the other hand, to attribute road safety solely to age is an oversimplification. Raising the age limit does not address the root causes of dangerous driving that are prevalent among all age groups. For example, many accidents are caused by experienced drivers who are distracted by mobile phones, driving under the influence of alcohol, or simply fatigued. Furthermore, a higher legal age might not be practical in many societies, especially in rural areas where public transport is scarce, and young people rely on driving for essential commutes to work or education. Disadvantaging these individuals by denying them a necessary skill and freedom could create significant social and economic problems.

In conclusion, while increasing the minimum driving age is a potentially beneficial policy that could mitigate risks for novice drivers, it is far from a comprehensive solution. To create a truly safe road environment, governments must implement a combination of stricter enforcement of existing laws, such as harsher penalties for speeding and drink-driving, alongside extensive public awareness campaigns. Ultimately, fostering a culture of responsibility and respect for road safety among all road users is the key to achieving lasting improvements.

范文解析

这篇范文获得高分，因为它在任务回应、连贯与衔接、词汇资源、语法范围和准确性这四个雅思评分标准上都表现出色。

审题与任务回应

• 准确理解题目： 题目要求讨论“提高法定驾驶年龄”是否是“提高道路安全的最佳方法”，关键词是 "best way"，这要求考生不能简单地同意或不同意，而需要权衡利弊,并提出更优的解决方案。
• 立场明确： 作者在引言段就清晰地表明了立场：部分同意，但认为这不是最佳方案，这是一个非常成熟和有深度的立场,避免了非黑即白的简单论述。
• 充分论证：
  • 同意方论点： 第二段详细阐述了提高年龄的好处，引用了“统计数据”、“缺乏经验”、“冒险行为”等理由，并举例说明,论证有力。
  • 不同意/反驳论点： 第三段是全文的亮点，作者没有直接反驳，而是指出“将安全完全归因于年龄是过于简化的”，他提出了更广泛的危险驾驶原因（分心、酒驾、疲劳），并考虑了该政策在现实社会（如农村地区）中的可行性和负面影响,使论证非常全面和有说服力。
• 结论升华： 结论段没有简单重复观点，而是总结性地提出，需要“多管齐下”（multi-faceted approach），并给出了具体的替代方案（更严格的执法、公众意识宣传），最后升华到“培养安全文化”的高度,体现了深刻的思考。

结构与连贯衔接

• 结构清晰： 经典的四段式结构（引言-同意方-不同意方-，逻辑流畅，易于考官理解。
  • 背景引入 + 亮明观点。
  • 主体段1： 承认对方观点有一定道理,并详细阐述。
  • 主体段2： 转折，提出更深层次的见解和反驳,展示思辨能力。
  • 总结观点,提出更全面的解决方案。
• 衔接手段丰富：
  • 逻辑连接词： While, On the one hand, On the other hand, For example, Furthermore, In conclusion, Ultimately 等,使段落和句子之间的逻辑关系一目了然。
  • 指代与重复： 使用 this measure, this argument, a comprehensive solution 等词汇来指代前文内容，避免重复,增强连贯性。
  • 段落主题句： 每个段落都有清晰的主题句,概括了该段的核心内容。

词汇资源

• 词汇丰富且精准：
  • 话题词汇： road safety, legislative solution, vulnerable demographic, distractions, public transport, stricter enforcement。
  • 高级词汇： perennial concern (经久不衰的担忧), overrepresented (代表性过高), propensity (倾向), underdeveloped sense of danger (不成熟的危险感知), plausible (合理的), demonstrably (明显地), oversimplification (过度简化), comprehensive solution (全面的解决方案), mitigate risks (降低风险), lasting improvements (持久的改善)。
• 词汇搭配地道： human and economic cost, access to a driver's license, fatigued, harsher penalties, public awareness campaigns。

语法范围与准确性

• 句式多样：
  • 简单句与复杂句结合： Young drivers... are statistically overrepresented... (简单句) 和 This is often attributed to a combination of factors, including... (复杂句)。
  • 使用多种从句： 定语从句 (...a legislative solution **by which** we could...)，状语从句 (While I acknowledge..., I firmly believe...)，名词性从句 (...the argument **that** this measure could...)。
  • 使用非谓语动词： ...denying them a necessary skill and freedom... (denying是动名词短语作结果状语)。
• 语法准确： 全文几乎没有语法错误，时态、语态、主谓一致等都使用正确。
• 标点符号使用规范： 逗号、分号、破折号等使用得当,增强了句子的可读性。

总结与备考建议

这篇范文是雅思大作文的典范之作，要写出类似的文章,考生可以参考以下建议：

1. 审题是关键： 务必仔细阅读题目，识别关键词（如 best, only, most）,确定题目的核心要求和讨论范围。
2. 构建复杂观点： 尝试提出一个“部分同意/不同意”或有条件的立场，这能更好地展示你的思辨能力，而不仅仅是“一边倒”的论证。
3. 结构先行： 在动笔前，花2-3分钟列一个提纲，明确每一段要写的核心内容，确保你的结构清晰、逻辑连贯。
4. 积累同义替换和高级词汇： 针对常见话题（教育、科技、环境、政府等）积累相关词汇和短语,并学习如何在不同语境中灵活运用。
5. 练习多样化句式： 在日常练习中，有意识地尝试使用不同的从句、非谓语动词和倒装等句式,让你的文章读起来更有节奏感和学术性。
6. 多读多思： 阅读高质量的英文文章（如《经济学人》、《卫报》的评论版），学习其论证方式和语言表达，并思考社会热点问题,形成自己的观点。

希望这篇范文和解析对你的雅思备考有所帮助！