剑雅4的作文题目（Task 2）非常经典，涵盖了雅思写作的几个核心题型：同意与否、双边讨论、利弊分析和报告类，这些题目至今仍具有很强的代表性，是备考雅思的绝佳素材。

下面我将逐一解析每道题目,并提供审题思路、结构框架、高分范文以及核心词汇/短语。

Test 1, Task 2

题目

Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

题型分析： 双边讨论，这是雅思写作中最常见的题型之一，你需要分别论述男女分校和混合学校的观点，并在最后给出自己的立场。

审题与思路

1. 核心关键词： educate boys and girls, separate schools (单性别学校), mixed schools (混合学校), benefit more (受益更多)。
2. 任务分解：
   • 观点一（支持单性别学校）： 论述为什么有人认为男女分校更好。
   • 观点二（支持混合学校）： 论述为什么有人认为混合学校更好。
   • 你的观点： 在以上讨论的基础上，给出你自己的看法，并说明理由。
3. 观点构思：
   • 支持单性别学校：
     • 减少分心： 青春期学生容易对异性产生好感，混合环境可能导致学习分心。
     • 打破性别刻板印象： 在单性别学校，女孩可以更自由地选择传统上被认为是“男性”的科目（如物理、工程），反之亦然，有助于培养自信。
     • 针对性教学： 教师可以根据不同性别的学习特点和兴趣进行更有针对性的教学。
   • 支持混合学校：
     • 模拟真实社会： 社会是男女共存的，混合学校提供了一个更真实的社会环境，有助于学生学会如何与异性正常交往和合作。
     • 培养社交技能： 学生可以学习沟通、尊重和理解异性，这对未来的个人生活和职业发展都至关重要。
     • 促进良性竞争： 男女之间的良性竞争可以激发双方的潜能，共同进步。

结构框架

• 开头段： 引入话题，说明这是一个有争议的问题，并点明本文将讨论双方观点，最后给出自己的立场。
• 主体段一： 论述支持单性别学校的观点，分论点可以是“减少分心”和“打破性别刻板印象”。
• 主体段二： 论述支持混合学校的观点，分论点可以是“模拟真实社会”和“培养社交技能”。
• 结尾段： 总结双方观点，并重申自己的立场（虽然单性别学校有其优点，但混合学校在培养学生的综合能力方面更具优势）。

高分范文

The debate over whether boys and girls should be educated in separate schools or in co-educational environments is a long-standing one. While proponents of single-sex schools argue that such settings can reduce distractions and challenge gender stereotypes, advocates for mixed schools contend that they better prepare students for the real world by fostering essential social skills. This essay will discuss both perspectives before offering a personal opinion.

On the one hand, there are clear advantages to segregating students by gender. Firstly, it is often believed that adolescent students, particularly teenagers, are less likely to be distracted by social and romantic attractions to the opposite sex, which can be a significant factor in a mixed-gender classroom. This can lead to greater focus on academic pursuits. Secondly, single-sex schools can help break down traditional gender stereotypes. For instance, girls may feel more encouraged to excel in subjects like science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), which are historically male-dominated, without feeling intimidated or judged. Similarly, boys might feel more at ease to pursue arts or humanities. This freedom can be crucial in developing a student's self-confidence and individuality.

On the other hand, the benefits of co-education are equally compelling. The primary argument is that mixed schools provide a microcosm of society, where individuals of different genders interact and collaborate on a daily basis. This experience is invaluable as it teaches students how to communicate effectively, build respectful relationships, and work in teams with people from diverse backgrounds. These social competencies are essential for future success in both personal and professional life. Furthermore, healthy competition between boys and girls can motivate students to strive for higher standards, benefiting the entire learning community.

In conclusion, while single-sex schools offer certain academic and psychological benefits, the advantages of co-educational institutions are more profound and far-reaching. The ability to navigate social dynamics and build collaborative skills in a realistic setting is an indispensable part of a holistic education. Therefore, I am of the opinion that mixed schools are a more beneficial environment for the overall development of children.

核心词汇/短语

• Debate: n. 争论，讨论
• Co-educational: adj. 男女同校的
• Proponents: n. 支持者，倡导者
• Segregating: v. 隔离，分离
• Distraction: n. 分心的事物
• Challenge gender stereotypes: 挑战性别刻板印象
• Advocates: n. 提倡者，拥护者
• Contend: v. 主张，认为
• Foster: v. 培养，促进
• Microcosm of society: 社会的缩影
• Invaluable: adj. 非常宝贵的，无价的
• Social competencies: 社交能力
• Holistic education: 全面的教育，整体教育

Test 2, Task 2

题目

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

题型分析： 双边讨论 + 价值判断，题目要求讨论高薪运动员的合理性，并给出自己的看法，这是一个涉及社会价值观的题目。

审题与思路

1. 核心关键词： Successful sports professionals (成功的体育专业人士), earn a great deal more money (赚更多钱), other important professions (其他重要职业), fully justified (完全合理), unfair (不公平)。
2. 任务分解：
   • 观点一（合理）： 论述为什么运动员的高薪是合理的。
   • 观点二（不合理）： 论述为什么这是不公平的。
   • 你的观点： 给出你的判断。
3. 观点构思：
   • 认为合理：
     • 市场供需法则： 运动员的技能是稀缺的，全球有大量观众愿意为观看他们的比赛付费，高薪是市场规律的体现。
     • 短暂的职业生涯和高强度训练： 运动员的职业生涯通常很短，且需要从童年开始进行严苛、高强度的训练，牺牲了普通人的青春和正常生活。
     • 巨大的娱乐价值和商业价值： 他们为公众带来巨大的精神享受，并带动了体育产业、旅游业、媒体等相关产业的发展。
   • 认为不公平：
     • 社会贡献不对等： 医生、教师、科学家等对社会有更直接、更根本的贡献，保障了社会的健康、发展和进步，但他们的收入远低于运动员。
     • 价值观扭曲： 过度强调体育明星的高薪，可能会误导年轻人，认为只有成为运动员才能获得成功，忽视了其他对社会同样重要的职业。

结构框架

• 开头段： 引出运动员高薪的现象，并指出这是一个关于公平和价值的争议性问题。
• 主体段一： 论述高薪的合理性，分论点：市场供需、短暂职业生涯、巨大娱乐价值。
• 主体段二： 论述高薪的不公平之处，分论点：社会贡献不对等、价值观扭曲。
• 结尾段： 承认两种观点都有道理，但倾向于一种，可以总结为，虽然高薪是市场行为，但社会也应重视和提升其他关键职业的收入和地位。

高分范文

It is an undeniable fact that top athletes often command salaries that dwarf those of professionals in other critical fields, such as medicine, education, and scientific research. This stark disparity has sparked a debate: is this financial gap fully justified, or is it inherently unfair? This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting a concluding viewpoint.

On one hand, there are strong arguments to support the high earnings of successful sports stars. Firstly, their income is largely determined by the principles of supply and demand. Their unique talents and skills are exceptionally rare, while the global demand for entertainment is immense. Spectators are willing to pay for tickets, merchandise, and television broadcasts, creating a massive revenue stream that is then distributed to the athletes. Secondly, a professional athletic career is typically short-lived and fraught with physical risk