剑十二小作文范文怎么写？-梅苑双语学院

图表作文高分策略与实战解析

（图片来源网络，侵删）

在雅思写作中,Task 1（小作文）作为图表题，要求考生在20分钟内完成至少150字的描述，重点在于数据的客观呈现、趋势的精准提炼以及逻辑的清晰连贯，以剑12 Test 6的柱状图为例，该题展示了2025年五个国家可再生能源发电量的占比，考生需从数据对比、最高/最低值、显著变化等角度切入，避免主观臆断，同时注意时态（一般过去时）和单位（百分比）的准确性，以下将从审题、结构、语言技巧及常见误区四个维度展开分析，并提供一篇高分范文供参考。

审题与数据提取：精准定位核心信息

审题是第一步,需明确图表类型（柱状图、线图、饼图等）、时间范围、核心数据单位及比较对象，剑12 Test 6的柱状图为静态图，对比2025年五个国家（冰岛、挪威、瑞典、葡萄牙、土耳其）的可再生能源发电占比，单位为百分比，考生需快速定位最高值（冰岛98%）、最低值（土耳其18%）及差异较小的国家（瑞典与挪威分别为68%和66%），同时注意是否有特殊数据（如葡萄牙的51%处于中等水平），数据提取时建议用荧光笔标注关键数字，避免遗漏。

结构布局：四段式逻辑框架

小作文推荐采用“总-分-总”四段式结构，确保层次分明：

开头段（1-2句）：概括图表核心内容，包括时间、对象及整体趋势。“The bar chart illustrates the proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources in five countries in 2025.”
主体段一（2-3句）：描述最高/最低值及极端数据。“Iceland recorded the highest percentage at 98%, while Turkey’s figure was the lowest, standing at 18%.”
主体段二（3-4句）：对比中间数据，分析国家间差异。“Sweden and Norway demonstrated similar figures, with 68% and 66% respectively, whereas Portugal’s proportion was slightly lower at 51%.”
结尾段（1句）：总结整体特征，无需添加新数据。“Overall, Iceland was the sole country where renewable energy accounted for over 90% of electricity production.”

语言技巧：提升表达的专业性与多样性

数据替换：避免重复使用“show/indicate”，可用“illustrate/demonstrate/reveal”等替代。
比较句式：
- 原级：“A’s figure was similar to B’s.”
- 比较级：“A’s percentage was slightly higher/lower than B’s.”
- 倍数关系：“A was twice as much as B.”
趋势词汇：静态图用“account for/constitute/represent”，动态图用“increase/decline/fluctuate”。

常见误区与避坑指南

主观分析：仅描述数据，不解释原因（如“冰岛占比高因地热资源丰富”属于错误）。
数据遗漏：未提及最高/最低值或关键对比点，导致信息不全。
时态错误：静态图用一般过去时，动态图需根据时间调整（如过去用一般过去时，预测用将来时）。

高分范文（约180词）

The bar chart compares the percentage of electricity generated from renewable sources in five countries— Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, and Turkey—in 2025. Overall, Iceland overwhelmingly led in renewable energy reliance, while Turkey lagged significantly behind.

（图片来源网络，侵删）

Iceland’s renewable electricity generation reached 98%, far surpassing other nations. In contrast, Turkey’s proportion was the lowest, at merely 18%. Norway and Sweden exhibited comparable figures, with 66% and 68% respectively, indicating a similar level of dependence on renewables. Portugal’s percentage, at 51%, was moderately lower than that of the Nordic countries but substantially higher than Turkey’s.

Notably, the gap between the highest (Iceland) and lowest (Turkey) values was substantial, reaching 80 percentage points. While Norway and Sweden maintained a relatively narrow difference of 2 percentage points, Portugal’s figure was approximately 17 percentage points lower than Sweden’s. In summary, the data reveals a stark contrast in renewable energy adoption across the five nations, with Iceland setting a benchmark and Turkey showing minimal progress.